Universities globally, are meant to be the custodians of education, academic thought, and research and should serve as think tanks for the various regions in which they are sited. They are ivory towers for the betterment of the human race.
For any university to progress, there are 3 broad areas to concentrate on, that I believe, pretty well cover all the bases.
1.
Faculty
and Staff.
2.
Students.
3.
Infrastructure/
Facilities.
Let me explain further.
1. Faculty and Staff
Universities should ensure that the quality of faculty and staff they hire is top-notch Faculty that have the requisite experience and are research-based. I remember one of the first set of hires at the American University of Nigeria included 2 Egyptian faculty for Petroleum Chemistry, who were international award winners and during their time, Petroleum Chemistry was one of the highest patronized courses. AUN also had a Political Science Prof who was an integral part of the Civil Rights movement in the US. There was also an American faculty who was one of the speech writers for Bill Clinton. They were also excellent faculty in Business and Entrepreneurship who did so well, that by extension they had an immediate impact on the host community.
We did the same for the start-up of BAZE University. The quality of faculty was paramount. The same applied to the quality of senior admin staff, from the President/ VC to the Directors. This ensured leadership by experience and adequate mentorship. Good faculty and staff help to maintain an adequate balance between culture, discipline, and social activities on campus while encouraging global academic thought.
Also important, is the provision of adequate tools and remuneration to ensure complete concentration on academics and administration. “Take care of your human resources and they should take care of you”. Get quality faculty and staff, give them the right tools, and remunerate them well. The quality of the faculty is also one of the fundamental reasons for increasing prominence and university rankings
I have been a witness to many institutions that have academically gone into the doldrums for their inability to replace outgoing faculty and staff with good and tested ones. Starting from those at the helm of affairs. Internal politics or self-induced fiscal crises have given birth to mediocre employees. This has dropped not only the educational quality but also the complete output of such institutions. The Babbagean theory of, “Garbage in. Garbage out", is what many of our institutions are battling with.
Almost
always, internal politics comes into play. Top Administrators look more at folks
who can massage their egos rather than getting the job done for institutional
growth. This is something I have witnessed even in Institutions with
international outlook. The high turnover of faculty and staff is unhealthy for the
long-term growth of organizations. The ineffective use of the grapevine is also
detrimental in many cases. A Top Administrator or a departmental head should be
able to entertain contrary opinions and look at their merits. Very often contrary
opinions, are seen as belittling the administrator, and a direct threat to his
authority. I have met bosses who were excellent and would appreciate superior
arguments and I have also met bosses who could take it not. I met bosses who preferred “tell tales” and I've also met those who appreciated not. I have also seen
ethnicity and religion play a part in who is deemed qualified and who is not.
2. Students
Strict emphasis should be placed on the type of students being recruited. Many universities that charge higher than average tuition fees, may tend to bend some rules to make up for the targets given. But let's say, all rules are followed and all students admitted have met the minimum entry requirements, what then? Has the institution provided the basic level of comfort, and equipment for a conducive academic exercise? These are academic students, not soldiers. Is the hostel, security, feeding, sports, counseling, health facilities, etc., commensurate with the fee being charged? Is a certain level of discipline being enforced? What about the issue of gangs or drugs? I know several non-faith-based institutions that have quite a lax enforcement policy on drugs and gangs. All these, negatively affect the image of the institution.
Mentorship for students is also important as are academic and social clubs that tend to bring about the hidden talent in kids or guide them towards it. I have founded several clubs based on entrepreneurship and IT that have given students exposure and they have done wonders. Get the right students, with the right facilities and they will sell the school for you. Students are excellent at spreading the word about an institution. If it’s good, they will spread its goodness. If they feel cheated, they will spread its negativity.
The quality
of students produced also does tremendous PR for an institution.
3. Infrastructure/ Facilities
I wouldn’t recommend short-changing the educational infrastructure to be provided. Get fully equipped labs, IT facilities, a well-stocked Library, Sports facilities, Hostels, Staff housing, a Student Center, excellent catering services, etc. Start well from the onset.
It is often said, to expand and equip as you make money. Investment in Education is a long-term thing not immediate. Equipping or improving the facility as funds come in after student intake can be foolhardy. Initial bamboozling is important for the growth of a high-end institution. Maintain the facilities. Get a comparative advantage over your rivals. Once people know your worth, they will look for you. It doesn’t matter, where in the country you are located, folks will find you. Mercedes doesn’t advertise as much as some Asian brands. But folks still know its quality.
Establish a facility that takes care of general institutional investment. For instance, an Entrepreneurship/ Investment Center or a Research Center that looks for investors and carries out research in specific areas. Such centers should identify areas where investment, endowments, and partnerships can be created. Many areas of low-hanging fruits can be plucked as well as long-term investments that can serve later as cash cows. These centers can serve as areas of excellence and help reduce overheads by bringing in much-needed funds. Partnerships, also create visibility and serve as avenues for faculty/ staff exchange and capacity building.
I have always believed that Universities'
MAIN concern should be providing quality
education, and not being an NGO. There are developmental agencies that do
the NGO work. It's NOT THE PRIMARY BUSINESS of a University to work as an NGO.
I have seen universities lose focus this way. They have become more of USAID
entities than citadels of learning and this has had disastrous consequences on
the quality of education. And this has been quite unfortunate. This is hara-kiri
at a continuous scale. Running a successful university is tough, and requires
patience and focus, but it's not rocket science. Concentrate on the three major
points above and you're pretty much there.
NOVEMBER 2023